Watching you watching me: Online proctoring, anxiety and test performance
Document Type
Poster Presentation
Publication Date
4-17-2026
Keywords
fsc2026
Abstract
Lower exam performance on proctored online exams is typically attributed to the idea that proctoring curtails cheating. The current study examined the relationship between online proctoring, test anxiety, and test performance longitudinally to test an alternative hypothesis that proctoring may lead to lower exam scores due to the cognitive and affective consequences of being surveilled. We compared the use of a virtual proctoring service in three different online psychology courses (N=112), which each had an experimental section and a control section. The experimental sections used online proctoring for the first exam only, while the control sections had no online proctoring. A mixed factorial ANOVA replicated the effect that students in proctored exams scored lower than students in non-proctored exams, regardless of whether the exam was open-book. A mediation analysis revealed that proctoring negatively influenced exam performance due in part to test anxiety. These results indicate that proctored students may score lower due to the anxiety that can occur from being watched. These results and alternative methods to support academic integrity in an online setting will be discussed.
Publication Information
McClure Brenchley, Kimberly; Merges, Eileen M.; and Sabourin, Katie, "Watching you watching me: Online proctoring, anxiety and test performance" (2026). Fisher Showcase 2026. Paper 137.
https://fisherpub.sjf.edu/fsc2026/137
Please note that the Publication Information provides general citation information and may not be appropriate for your discipline. To receive help in creating a citation based on your discipline, please visit https://libguides.sjf.edu/citations.
Comments
Poster presented at the 2026 Fisher Showcase, St. John Fisher University, April 17, 2026.